And the Defendant now, according to his own logic, insults the Immeasurably Honorable Supreme Justice W. Man. Which is it, PERFIDIOUS TIRIN? U OR NO U TELL ME THE TRUTH.Honorable Supreme Justice W. Man
And the Defendant now, according to his own logic, insults the Immeasurably Honorable Supreme Justice W. Man. Which is it, PERFIDIOUS TIRIN? U OR NO U TELL ME THE TRUTH.Honorable Supreme Justice W. Man
Why, how dare you say such a thing about the Honourable Supreme Justice W. Man! This is a courtroom, not a locker room!And the Defendant now, according to his own logic, insults the Degenerate Wannabe Justice W. Man.
As have you!Regardless of having taken an oath or not, the Defendant has knowingly and intentionally presented a falsehood to the court.
The Prosecution would first like to point out that this is false. The Defendant cannot show that anyone else here has knowingly presented any falsehoods. However the Defendant HAS editted a quote, and changed the record of his statements after being called out on one of said statements.As have you!
You have knowingly engaged in accusing me of breaking laws that do not exist - or, if not, have knowingly entered this courtroom with the intention of posing as a certified forum attorney. Either sounds to me like the actions of the Menace.The Prosecution would first like to point out that this is false. The Defendant cannot show that anyone else here has knowingly presented any falsehoods. However the Defendant HAS editted a quote, and changed the record of his statements after being called out on one of said statements.
It's not only true, but a well-known and exceedingly pleasurable fact. One may assume that this somehow violates causality, but that is far from the case. Allow me to demonstrate the chain of events:Secondly, Defendant Tirin, is it true that you have engaged in time clone sex orgies?
Where in forum law does it state that spelling may be a basis for a punitive moniker? Clearly the law is not well defined and instead much is left to the discretion of the Impeccably Honorable Supreme Justice W. Man. Therefore, the accusation that I am accusing you of breaking non-existent laws is irrelevant, as the existence of a particular law is clearly not entirely pertinent to punishments. Similarly, what specific laws did the Defendant Colonel "TC" Thunder break? Again, justice is not based on well defined and commonly understood laws. Further, by insisting the Prosecutor has knowingly and intentionally presented some falsehood, the Defendant has assumed that the Prosecutor is infallible and knows the full extent of the law, the law which is clearly ill defined anyways. Such an assumption is ridiculous. As well, the Prosecutor has made no attempt to present himself as a "certified forum attorney", merely as a prosecutor. It is, again, not clearly defined anywhere what requirements there are for either of those roles. This accusation, which the Defendant has made under oath, is blatantly false. The Prosecution must therefore ask, Defendant Tirin, are you in fact infallible? If such is the case, you have knowingly and intentionally lied under oath, which the Prosecution would suggest falls under perjury.You have knowingly engaged in accusing me of breaking laws that do not exist - or, if not, have knowingly entered this courtroom with the intention of posing as a certified forum attorney. Either sounds to me like the actions of the Menace.
The Prosecution thanks the Defendant for the volunteered explanation of causality preserving sex orgies, but that is not the form of causality violation the Prosecution is concerned with. Prosecution motions that the record reflect the Defendant's sexual deviance.It's not only true, but a well-known and exceedingly pleasurable fact.
I did not give you that punitive moniker (though happily applied it to your character as an adjective), merely noted that you were showing a great deal of disrespect to the Honourable Supreme Justice W. Man - who bestowed said moniker upon you. Clearly his discretion is what led to that occurring in the first place. Furthermore, contempt of court is an offence in many different jurisdictions, and said disrespect could be covered under that legal umbrella. Unless you would disagree with the Honourable Supreme Justice's judgment, I do recommend that you drop this matter.Where in forum law does it state that spelling may be a basis for a punitive moniker? Clearly the law is not well defined and instead much is left to the discretion of the Impeccably Honorable Supreme Justice W. Man. Therefore, the accusation that I am accusing you of breaking non-existent laws is irrelevant, as the existence of a particular law is clearly not entirely pertinent to punishments. Similarly, what specific laws did the Defendant Colonel "TC" Thunder break? Again, justice is not based on well defined and commonly understood laws. Further, by insisting the Prosecutor has knowingly and intentionally presented some falsehood, the Defendant has assumed that the Prosecutor is infallible and knows the full extent of the law, the law which is clearly ill defined anyways. Such an assumption is ridiculous. As well, the Prosecutor has made no attempt to present himself as a "certified forum attorney", merely as a prosecutor. It is, again, not clearly defined anywhere what requirements there are for either of those roles. This accusation, which the Defendant has made under oath, is blatantly false. The Prosecution must therefore ask, Defendant Tirin, are you in fact infallible? If such is the case, you have knowingly and intentionally lied under oath, which the Prosecution would suggest falls under perjury.
Lastly, that having been stated solely in the interest of clarification for the court with no intent to add legitimacy to the Defendant's actions, OBJECTION! Witnesses on the stand should answer questions, not opine about baseless and immaterial accusations.
Of course. Similarly to my previous answer, however, these powers have not been used to violate causality; they instead flow around it in a way that is unfamiliar to your inherently much more limited temporal perspective and so appear to violate causality. Is this going somewhere?The Prosecution thanks the Defendant for the volunteered explanation of causality preserving sex orgies, but that is not the form of causality violation the Prosecution is concerned with. Prosecution motions that the record reflect the Defendant's sexual deviance.
Defendant Tirin, is it true you have used your time powers for purposes other than time clone sex?
Firstly, OBJECTION. The Defendant has not been asked to opine further on this matter and has chosen not to await the ruling of the Imperviously Honorable Supreme Justice W. Man, which the Prosecution believes is an act of contempt of court.I did not give you that punitive moniker (though happily applied it to your character as an adjective), merely noted that you were showing a great deal of disrespect to the Honourable Supreme Justice W. Man - who bestowed said moniker upon you. Clearly his discretion is what led to that occurring in the first place. Furthermore, contempt of court is an offence in many different jurisdictions, and said disrespect could be covered under that legal umbrella. Unless you would disagree with the Honourable Supreme Justice's judgment, I do recommend that you drop this matter.
Until further evidence is gathered, the court shall presume innocence for Tirin on the charge of perjury by quote manipulation.he Defendant Tirin has committed perjury by quote manipulation.
Overruled. As is customary in this court, the speech of those on the stand is only limited by the confines of A) oaths taken and B) responsiveness to questions.OBJECTION! Witnesses on the stand should answer questions, not opine about baseless and immaterial accusations.
Overruled, per above.Firstly, OBJECTION. The Defendant has not been asked to opine further on this matter and has chosen not to await the ruling of the Imperviously Honorable Supreme Justice W. Man, which the Prosecution believes is an act of contempt of court.
The court would like to address that responsiveness to questions is by, Walrus Court law, an obligation of those on the stand.Further, the Defendant...has ignored the much larger question of what specific, previously defined, and commonly understood laws were broken by the condemned "TC".
Granted. The record has been updated.Prosecution motions that the record reflect the Defendant's sexual deviance.
You may proceed if so desired. Due to the unprecedented delay between your objections and this court's rulings upon them, this Day is hereby extended by 5 hours, until 11:30PM EDTProsecution will continue the line of questioning with regards to the Defendant's time travel depending on the Court's ruling on his objections.
I never claimed that it was righteous, nor a courtroom strategy. I claimed it would be fun. I mean, what the hell have you been doing during the night phases that's so important - attempting to corrupt this fine forum or murder its inhabitants? Unless you'll lay claim to that, I think Firedemon is the far more likely culprit.Sorry for my absence your honour, I struggle to find the words in this format. Much like a disgruntled middle aged man with little time for jury duty, I am tempted to follow the path of least resistance and continue aiding Tirin against the Perfidious Firedemon, but I know such an action with little information would not be righteous. Though it would take much deliberation and meditation to consider Tirins now confirmed and documented self sex orgy strategy righteous also.
I modify the history of the universe all the time, what's important is that it doesn't violate the laws of causality. But even if it did - which it doesn't - that term is used only because causality is considered a "law" in the physical sense where it would be unbreakable, and therefore there is no legal punishment for breaking it.I would like to point out a major typo of mine, "God heavens" instead of "good heavens" was taken in stride, whereas Tirin felt the need to modify the history of the universe in order to fix his situation. A fragile, if not outright nervous demeanour that does reveal., I hope the stand you were questioned on was not as feeble as thou, or you may have fallen through the floor.
I'm thinking more a menace in the courtroom, and it's pretty fuckin' clear that Firedemon is that what with his reckless disregard for the facts and strange fixation on my sex life.In fact, it's entirely possible The Menace is an allegory for being a menace in the bedroom, of which Tirin is now definitely confirmed.
Actually this argument clicked something for me.I'm thinking more a menace in the courtroom, and it's pretty fuckin' clear that Firedemon is that what with his reckless disregard for the facts and strange fixation on my sex life.