Sorry for being late everyone!
I've been busy between the debate last night, working out in the morning, working then going out with friends.
Overall, I'm not certain if @Xander counts towards @Dunsparce attitude even though it was a gag post!
We still have about two days left to figure out this puzzle, but I'm sure that if we put our big brains together, we can figure it out!
Dunsparce was already being bullied, so I feel it's a bit rude to jump on that! I'm just at a loss of where to really progress with this lynch rule:
I've been busy between the debate last night, working out in the morning, working then going out with friends.
Overall, I'm not certain if @Xander counts towards @Dunsparce attitude even though it was a gag post!
To chime in with my experience running a game, I feel like it would probably be one mafia and one independent. Given @Colonel Thunder 's track record with poop games (Which are lovely mafia games and a fun sub-game to look forward to after a completed game!), it seems they're incredibly quick.Req's pushing in and backing off a no lynch are causing me to think about scum size a little earlier than I'd hoped. What sounds more reasonable in an 8 player game, 2 Mafia or 1 Mafia and 1 Independant?
Excellent catch! I do like the outside of the box thought process for a poop game, but I think a normal game with a cutiepool2-esque flavor is the best approach to this beast!Though I do admit to missing this line when I first read, so now I'm doubting my own idea even more. Since that's the case, I am willing to drop discussion of my idea and moving onto us playing a normal game with fun flavor.
We still have about two days left to figure out this puzzle, but I'm sure that if we put our big brains together, we can figure it out!
Dunsparce was already being bullied, so I feel it's a bit rude to jump on that! I'm just at a loss of where to really progress with this lynch rule:
I feel like this is a key piece of the puzzle!Players should always lynch the most toxic (or least wholesome) player unless significant evidence suggests they are innocent. This rule is open to interpretation.