Good ladies and gentlemen of Mach Entertainment, I would like to announce my candidacy for mayor of this good forum from 2018 until whatever inconsistent date our next one will fall upon.
The crux of the most prominent issues regarding our great forum appear to lie in its constitution; however, there are some things that I feel it necessary to address, being a major enforcer of said constitution.
The thing is that (aside from, shockingly, Walrus Man), most of the other candidates do not have enforceable or realistic goals for an edited Constitution, and even Walrus Man's is sorely lacking in content. I sincerely hope that each and everyone one of you will make the correct choice and vote for me as your new/old mayor. I will bring peace, freedom, justice, and security to our forum - as I always have.
The crux of the most prominent issues regarding our great forum appear to lie in its constitution; however, there are some things that I feel it necessary to address, being a major enforcer of said constitution.
The Mach Constitution is largely fine except for an inconsistency regarding point values applied; it is noted in the Constitution that limitations are to be applied on the assigning of points in Section 3. However this is not mentioned in any part of Section 3 regarding offences such as disrespect to the forum, staff, or individuals, and thus is left largely up to moderator discretion in these cases. A more transparent system may be worth investing into, so that everyone is aware why they were warned and abuse of the system by admins or moderators can be investigated.
A more systematic way for addressing grievances (via Forum Court) could also be edited into Section X of the Constitution, as well as a manner to actually determine how edits are done. This should allow for more flexibility regarding the Constitution and what is and is not considered acceptable by forumers.
A more systematic way for addressing grievances (via Forum Court) could also be edited into Section X of the Constitution, as well as a manner to actually determine how edits are done. This should allow for more flexibility regarding the Constitution and what is and is not considered acceptable by forumers.
The thing is that (aside from, shockingly, Walrus Man), most of the other candidates do not have enforceable or realistic goals for an edited Constitution, and even Walrus Man's is sorely lacking in content. I sincerely hope that each and everyone one of you will make the correct choice and vote for me as your new/old mayor. I will bring peace, freedom, justice, and security to our forum - as I always have.