Why do you guys keep saying I'm playing shit town, all I did was point out that i didn't like the reasoning for the chicken Lynch, which surprise surprise, he was town. As for day 2 I've been reading and rereading the posts and I can't think of anyone better to Lynch than Ro, and it's not because he's "playing emotionally", it's because he's playing tactically, he's making moves that I can't counteract in a way that doesn't make me look like scum.
He claimed Mason and outed his partner, scum normally wouldn't do this, right?
well take a look at what happens if we Lynch me as the townie, on days 3&4 the Lynch is undeniably going to fall hard and fast on Ro and Tolvan. That looks bad right? Well not when you consider his little productive conversation happens on those days, once day 5 rolls around the game will be left to the last three players, and the townies will(most likely) have no idea if the other player is the witch or the other townie. That's huge for them, can win them the game with a single town mistake.
Now what's the downside for the play? if we lynch him as the scum what happens night 2? I'll probably get night killed. then on day 3 town lynches Tolvan, night 3 another townie dies, day 4, it's one scum vs four townies, but with the lack of discussion on day 3 it's somewhat likely that, if he isn't an idiot, the remaining scum will survive, pushing him to day five with only one day of thought gone into finding out who is the last witch.
So that's why doing what seems to be a stupid play isn't as stupid as it looks. "but that only works out if they're the mafia" you might say, and that's true, but if I'm scum and I am lynched today it confirms two masons, one of which will probably be killed at night to end their conversations. then what?
"But what if there's a serial killer, or Vig?" then if we lynch Ro and he's scum the vig can kill Tolvan and the witches will kill me most likely, but if he's not scum then the vig will kill me and the witches will kill tolvan. if we lynch me you'll only end up losing a town players.
He claimed Mason and outed his partner, scum normally wouldn't do this, right?
well take a look at what happens if we Lynch me as the townie, on days 3&4 the Lynch is undeniably going to fall hard and fast on Ro and Tolvan. That looks bad right? Well not when you consider his little productive conversation happens on those days, once day 5 rolls around the game will be left to the last three players, and the townies will(most likely) have no idea if the other player is the witch or the other townie. That's huge for them, can win them the game with a single town mistake.
Now what's the downside for the play? if we lynch him as the scum what happens night 2? I'll probably get night killed. then on day 3 town lynches Tolvan, night 3 another townie dies, day 4, it's one scum vs four townies, but with the lack of discussion on day 3 it's somewhat likely that, if he isn't an idiot, the remaining scum will survive, pushing him to day five with only one day of thought gone into finding out who is the last witch.
So that's why doing what seems to be a stupid play isn't as stupid as it looks. "but that only works out if they're the mafia" you might say, and that's true, but if I'm scum and I am lynched today it confirms two masons, one of which will probably be killed at night to end their conversations. then what?
"But what if there's a serial killer, or Vig?" then if we lynch Ro and he's scum the vig can kill Tolvan and the witches will kill me most likely, but if he's not scum then the vig will kill me and the witches will kill tolvan. if we lynch me you'll only end up losing a town players.