*shrug* I kinda tried to get FD killed yesterday instead of TC. Neither of them feel/felt like scum to me, but someone needed to die and TC was the most likely, so I went with him, but I still sorta targeted FD to an extent.Req and FD are scum.
Sorry - been entertaining guests for the past few days. Tonight was a drinking night.Speaking of people who haven't said something in a bit... @Jeroth what is your take/input on the current situation?
That's just what a mafia member would say!@Jeroth is a town. I know, I've seen his PM.
Also, how did you see Jeroth's PM? Cheater.
Shh... Don't tell anyone. I'm psychic.That's just what a mafia member would say!
Why bring up something you don't believe? Why speculate so much on something you don't stand behind or wish to have analyzed? Because if we cut that part of your post out, all you wrote is a defense on why you weren't the one to kill White.*Wild theory that I don't even even believe, but I want to throw it there just in case time, even though I wanted to post this last day but I missed the end of the day*
Req and FD are scum. Req trusted TC's reasonless lack of suspicion against FD way too easily in my opinion. After TC's crappy reason for adding FD o his spared list, I feel like they may have tried to either force a no lynch, failing that, they could get the TC Lynch, or sacrifice FD so someone (Req would try to avoid doing it himself) would bring up how TC gave FD the free pass, this would have pit TC against another townie keeping Req safe at least one more day, plus if TC convinced us he was innocent (which seeing as he was is a possibility, depending on the accuser's methods) and we lynched the accuser, they would flip townie and we'd almost definitely Lynch TC the next day, which would leave us at the final day.
Now, as I said, I don't believe this is true, but I believe it's a possibility we may have to look at later in the game, so don't even worry about it, or even acknowledge it, just now.
Now as for my input on the night kill... Nobody really had any hostility to WT, not that it would help us find whoever killed him. However, I'm not going to gloss over the fact that I said I wasn't against lynching WT if there was a not Shitty reason, but that's really all I can say about that.
Anyways let's not rush anywhere, we only have one mislynch before we go to mylo, so think about your claims carefully.
I really hope you're not pulling the joking admission of being Mafia "in your face" postgame-play right now. Because up to now, I've been cool with everything you've said. On that note, who are you suspicious of?*shrug* I kinda tried to get FD killed yesterday instead of TC. Neither of them feel/felt like scum to me, but someone needed to die and TC was the most likely, so I went with him, but I still sorta targeted FD to an extent.
Honestly though, the people I'm suspicious of are the ones who aren't talking much, but that's not really enough evidence to make anything happen. I'm almost wanting to start pulling on the "Req and FD are scum" thread just to see if something comes out of it and I'm scum in that scenario, lol. No one's really pointing out anything, so, yeah, I guess that's my contribution? Maybe? :|
Why are you giving Tag's theory credence, when he's your highest suspicion? Furthermore, why are placing Req as a higher priority than Ibix and myself based on what you wrote?Sorry - been entertaining guests for the past few days. Tonight was a drinking night.
As far as the situation goes, it's a tough one. We're playing in a game with no power roles. There are seven players with two mafia among them. We've lost two of us. The game is pretty much over after this day unless we hit a mafia member.
Day 2: Lynch, 6 players.
Night 2: Kill, 5 players.
Day 3: Lynch, 4 players. - Game Over.
This is a mislynch or lose situation. I know that I'm being repetitive, but having the numbers in a post opposed to just "saying" it is nicer.
Currently, the players are: @Firedemon , @Requiem , @Jeroth , @Tolvan , @Salsy , @Ibix and @Tag_Ross
@Firedemon is a town since he's willing to paint himself as suspicious as seen in his post about "No, I wouldn't have necessarily killed you." If he were to cling to Tolvan as a supporter, it would be much more obvious.
@Requiem was surprisingly chatty on the first day and has dropped off, but I understand. The first day is to generate chatter and find inconsistencies later on.
@Jeroth is a town. I know, I've seen his PM.
@Tolvan is a town or a convincing mafia member. He's absent-minded and as Salsy mentioned the Village Idiot.
@Salsy is an absolute wild card. I don't know if he's town or scum, but he's clever and neutral in his posts. There's no bias and no targeting - just facts.
@Ibix - I'm unsure about. Mostly quiet during Day 1 until I poked him and even then it was observational.
@Tag_Ross is currently suspicious, but that's because he's the only one being aggressive.
This game is incredibly difficult due to the lack of power roles for town. They add an extra element to the game, so it's sad to see them missing.
My only guesses at the moment would be:
Tag_Ross for the aggression.
Req for Tag_Ross' theory.
I genuinely have no idea on who is scum right now.
I agree that Tag wasn't being aggressive (in the sense than everything he said literally meant nothing). Although, I do not agree with playing any assumption game. The mafia has just as much reason to not be on a lynch as to be on it. Avoid suspicion vs kill faster. There's no reason to not look at everyone. Especially when they're talking yet not saying anything.Tag I'd give a very, very minor suspicion to for what was, in my opinion, a very convoluted theory. Again, very, very minor. He even said himself he didn't believe it. I really wouldn't call Tag aggressive. Jeroth and Ibix I'd give suspicion to for being a bit quiet, much more so Ibix. I'd put some suspicion on myself, Salsy, Req, Jeroth, and Ibix for all being on the TC bandwagon, as we can pretty much assume one or both mafia would be on that bandwagon, since the mafia has no reason not to help the town mislynch. Extra suspicion on Ibix for hammering with little given reason, though I do find it fairly, perhaps completely, acceptable given the quickly approaching deadline. The way I see it Ibix is the most suspicious, but he's at like, 2 out of 10 suspicion compared to everyone else's 1 or 0 in my book, which, after day 1 I don't quite call enough for a lynch vote.
Ah fuck it, let's make something happen. Lynch Ibix
Tomorrow is Wednesday, which is also the deadline. I hope you mean you're back before then.I may make a post or two in the morning, but I should be completely gone tomorrow until Wednesday. So, keep that in mind if you want my input on things or notice my mysterious disappearance.
Actually, crap, should I be putting up a weakly based lynch right before leaving for 24 hours? You guys have a habit of escalating shit, like that one time I got TC random lynched in less than a day. Ah that was beautiful. Uh... Fuck it, don't hammer him if you guys decide to go nuts with this.
Also, how did you see Jeroth's PM? Cheater.
As far as Req goes, I'm suspicious due to a mix of intuition and the inconsistency of his posts.Why are you giving Tag's theory credence, when he's your highest suspicion? Furthermore, why are placing Req as a higher priority than Ibix and myself based on what you wrote?
Yeah pretty much, I had nothing to go on so I kept the stupid theory I was gonna post earlier (when it was almost relevant) but nothing really happened this day and I had hoped it would have started some conversation.Lynch Tag
Why bring up something you don't believe? Why speculate so much on something you don't stand behind or wish to have analyzed? Because if we cut that part of your post out, all you wrote is a defense on why you weren't the one to kill White.
While I do believe we can assume there are two mafia, I don't believe we can completely write off the possibility of a lone mafia, especially if you're going to calculate that we have to Lynch scum right now or we lose (with 2 mafia we can mislynch once without losing the game, but we can narrow the pick down if we nolynch twice, which I'm not recommending yet)As far as the situation goes, it's a tough one. We're playing in a game with no power roles. There are seven players with two mafia among them. We've lost two of us. The game is pretty much over after this day unless we hit a mafia member.
Day 2: Lynch, 6 players.
Night 2: Kill, 5 players.
Day 3: Lynch, 4 players. - Game Over.
This is a mislynch or lose situation. I know that I'm being repetitive, but having the numbers in a post opposed to just "saying" it is nicer.
I disagree with your reason for believing he's townie, it's a common enough tactic and it doesn't try to disprove that he's not scum.@Firedemon is a town since he's willing to paint himself as suspicious as seen in his post about "No, I wouldn't have necessarily killed you." If he were to cling to Tolvan as a supporter, it would be much more obvious.
Dripping activity when the weekend is over could be a sign of too many things for it to matter.@Requiem was surprisingly chatty on the first day and has dropped off, but I understand. The first day is to generate chatter and find inconsistencies later on.
I've seen my PM too, I'm a train, seeing as you're not I might be able to assume you're not on my team.@Jeroth is a town. I know, I've seen his PM.
Not the village idiot, just inexperienced, which shouldn't clear him of suspicion, as long as there rightful reason to be suspected.@Tolvan is a town or a convincing mafia member. He's absent-minded and as Salsy mentioned the Village Idiot.
If this wasn't a vanilla game I'd think he was a third party of some sort.@Salsy is an absolute wild card. I don't know if he's town or scum, but he's clever and neutral in his posts. There's no bias and no targeting - just facts.
That's... Just Ibix. He really ought to speak up more in these things.@Ibix - I'm unsure about. Mostly quiet during Day 1 until I poked him and even then it was observational.
if you call that aggressive you've never seen me play as scum where I know exactly who to kill.@Tag_Ross is currently suspicious, but that's because he's the only one being aggressive.
Don't rely on power roles, dependence is one of the reasons we've been playing more vanillaish games, you got to go with your gut, unless you're scum then you have to outwit everyone.This game is incredibly difficult due to the lack of power roles for town. They add an extra element to the game, so it's sad to see them missing.
Don't do that, I literally said it was a terrible theory, the only reason you should consider it is if it's the last possinle day, one was already proven scum and the other is still alive, and even then it's still not a good thing to base your suspicion on.My only guesses at the moment would be:
Tag_Ross for the aggression.
Req for Tag_Ross' theory.
For someone who believes this is a Mylo you had no problem lynching someone who wasn't your most suspect, he did however have someone targeting him(with multiple less than stellar reasons, only one of which doesn't also apply to you) as well as a Lynch counted against him.I genuinely have no idea on who is scum right now.
Nah, I think that fad ended a while back. It wouldn't be as fun to do in this game anyway. Without roles or a higher number of players and with a decreased amount of discussion, doing the whole post game role reveal during the game thing just loses its luster. Plus, I think Shadow wouldn't appreciate people pulling that move again since he seems to want a straight, by-the-books game.I really hope you're not pulling the joking admission of being Mafia "in your face" postgame-play right now. Because up to now, I've been cool with everything you've said. On that note, who are you suspicious of?
Or play mafia ever? 1 mafia to 8 villagers is a terrible balance. 2 Mafia to 7 villagers is the obvious choice.The only way you can be absolutely sure of their numbers is if you're a part if them.
Completely valid. Ibix quickly followed after you and Req.For someone who believes this is a Mylo you had no problem lynching someone who wasn't your most suspect, he did however have someone targeting him(with multiple less than stellar reasons, only one of which doesn't also apply to you) as well as a Lynch counted against him.
The reason that I said they were inconsistent is that you were incredibly chatty at the start of day 1 and dropped off in day 2.I'm not sure what's inconsistent about them. Am I not posting as frequently as I was before and that's the inconsistency? Or is there some element of my posts from day 1 that isn't present in day 2? I don't really know myself, so we'd need Jeroth to explain that one. As it stands, the point is sort of just hanging in the air.