Your Honor, this is getting out of hand. I ask that the prosecutor refrains from posting images, gifs, and music that are not related to this case. Such media negatively effect the clarity of these proceedings and serve as an emotional appeal to excite those observing the case. Furthermore...
41 views mean there were 41 viewers, they just weren't all there at once. Furthermore, Twitch statistics disregard the viewership of the streamer, meaning there there was an average of 10 unique viewers at any given point during the stream. Given that this community has historically regarded robots as independent entities (Tolvan, 13thforswarn, the spambots that make threads that community members say hello to) this number may actually be 11.
That being said, I am not denying that a significant percent of my viewers who witnessed the alleged bamboozling were forumers. I am denying that my stream services the Mach Entertainment community with any form of exclusivity or special privilege, and thusly may not be eligible for trial in this district. The prosecutor has tried to convince the jury otherwise.
This is a false statement, your Honor. Danny, who's Twitch account is geek2games, was not present for this event. My opponent is mistaking one of my
thousands of non-Mach Entertainment viewers, dannythesloth7, as Danny.
This is yet another instance of the prosecutor presenting false information, whether intentionally or not.
Your Honor, the prosecutor is once again providing incomplete evidence.
By viewing the recording of the stream here (
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/228874847) and viewing from 1:14:57 1:16:39, all parties can clearly see both the entire incident of the alleged bamboozling as well as who was present and who was speaking.