Star Wars: The Force Awakens

W1LG3RtheCyan

Well-Known Member
Member
Kylo Ren is an intriguing character. I like that his powers are impressive in their own right, but he is not yet a master Sith Lord. His spasms of anger along with his apparent fear of the Great Leader and of succumbing to the Light Side of the Force give him some substance. Seeing him essentially praying to the mask of his grand father Darth Vader really showed him as young and insecure, and I like that. He's not just an all powerful, ruthless villain like the Emperor in the original trilogy, he's got some edges to him. I'm eager to see how he rebounds from his defeat to Rey and how his apparent rivalry with General Hawks(?) progresses. Last note, his image is totally badass.

So, Kylo Ren vs. Artanis... discuss with spoiler tags as necessary. My money's on Artanis, for obvious reasons.
 
Last edited:

Chickenspleen

Well-Known Member
Member
So reading 13ths thoughts has made me realize that it's even more important now to watch the prequels. Not just because it helps build the world, but because it shows you just how much TFA redeemed the franchise.
 

13thforsworn

Well-Known Member
Member

The Rebel Alliance was a relatively tiny band of freedom fighters, as compared with a galaxy-spanning military and economic powerhouse with technically legitimate political control. The question isn't "how did the Rebels let the Empire re-organize?" (especially since they literally only killed a few guys at the top and blew up their superweapons), but rather "how would they expect to do anything else?". As for the origins of the First Order, well - I suspect Snoke was a Darkside Adept of some kind under Palpatine.

This is a fair point.


Kylo Ren isn't a Sith Lord at all - he's Padawan-tier at best, and is in fact a massive puss when compared to the high-tier feats that we see Darth Vader and Palpatine accomplish (though they fare much better in the prequels and other new Star Wars media, owing in large part to the better choreography and budget for special effects). That said, I'm hype for him getting trained and hopefully becoming a more threatening villain, as while he's plenty threatening to random people, he's evidently not that big a deal against Force-sensitives.

This is what I meant. He's obviously not a Sith Lord by any means, but he has the talent to become one, with training. His mother was a Skywalker, was she not?



>implying any of the things in that last sentence are true
The reason why I make the Lord Vader/Darth Sidious comparison is because (according to the prequels, which I realize is shaky ground to base any opinion on), there are only ever two Sith. The master and the apprentice. So Snoke is the master, and Ren is the apprentice. He strives to be the Vader he thinks he can become. If we are to throw out that logic (because it's actually kinda stupid, why can't there be many Sith as there were Jedi?), then Kylo Ren and Snoke are the only Sith we know of at this point, so I think the comparison is fair. He's not nearly as powerful as Vader, but with the completion of his training, as is alluded to at the end of VII, he could be.
 

Tirin

God-Emperor of Tealkind
Moderator
The reason why I make the Lord Vader/Darth Sidious comparison is because (according to the prequels, which I realize is shaky ground to base any opinion on), there are only ever two Sith. The master and the apprentice. So Snoke is the master, and Ren is the apprentice. He strives to be the Vader he thinks he can become. If we are to throw out that logic (because it's actually kinda stupid, why can't there be many Sith as there were Jedi?), then Kylo Ren and Snoke are the only Sith we know of at this point, so I think the comparison is fair. He's not nearly as powerful as Vader, but with the completion of his training, as is alluded to at the end of VII, he could be.
There were only ever two Sith in the movies because of Darth Bane's Rule of Two demanding it in the hopes of the Sith surviving a long time; before this rule, the Sith made empires, formed armies, and etcetera, but kept getting badly wrecked by the Jedi (as well as collapsing in on one another) - so Bane thought that they should keep hidden to avoid this fate. Given that the Rule of Two led to the near-total destruction of the Jedi (realized through Palpatine), it seems to have had merit.

While there certainly could be more Sith, whether or not it's a good idea is debatable, owing to their self-destructive tendencies. Furthermore, Snoke was/is presumably not one of the Sith, as the Rule of Two was in place until Vader and Sidious both died; while he could have obtained knowledge of the Sith, he would essentially be declaring himself a Sith Lord. Extending the same title to Kylo Ren is very, very generous.

...And no, I very much doubt that Kylo Ren could be as powerful as Vader, whether or not he completes his training. He's at the point that he would still lose a fight to Episode II Anakin, and against actual Vader he'd do even worse.
 

Null Hypothesis

Well-Known Member
Donor III
There were only ever two Sith in the movies because of Darth Bane's Rule of Two demanding it in the hopes of the Sith surviving a long time; before this rule, the Sith made empires, formed armies, and etcetera, but kept getting badly wrecked by the Jedi (as well as collapsing in on one another) - so Bane thought that they should keep hidden to avoid this fate. Given that the Rule of Two led to the near-total destruction of the Jedi (realized through Palpatine), it seems to have had merit.

While there certainly could be more Sith, whether or not it's a good idea is debatable, owing to their self-destructive tendencies. Furthermore, Snoke was/is presumably not one of the Sith, as the Rule of Two was in place until Vader and Sidious both died; while he could have obtained knowledge of the Sith, he would essentially be declaring himself a Sith Lord. Extending the same title to Kylo Ren is very, very generous.

...And no, I very much doubt that Kylo Ren could be as powerful as Vader, whether or not he completes his training. He's at the point that he would still lose a fight to Episode II Anakin, and against actual Vader he'd do even worse.
While this is all true if you look at the Expanded Universe and normally I would agree with everything you said, however we have to take in mind that Disney did declare the entire EU not cannon. Though the Rule of Two is briefly mentioned in Episode I making it cannon, the rules are never explained (in the movies) only that there is always two a master and an apprentice. It has also been over 30 years since the death of Sidious and Vader, plenty of time for Snoke to rise to power even if he started from nothing. Even if we do still consider the EU cannon Snoke would not be the first to declare himself a Sith Lord with no formal Sith training.

One thing to also take note is that the title Sith Darth is never used in Episode VII. Not for Snoke or for Kylo Ren. This (even though the EU is no longer cannon) leads me to believe this is an entirely new Sith order that isn't bound by the old ones restraints.
 

Tolvan

Campaign Killer
Member
While this is all true if you look at the Expanded Universe and normally I would agree with everything you said, however we have to take in mind that Disney did declare the entire EU not cannon. Though the Rule of Two is briefly mentioned in Episode I making it cannon, the rules are never explained (in the movies) only that there is always two a master and an apprentice. It has also been over 30 years since the death of Sidious and Vader, plenty of time for Snoke to rise to power even if he started from nothing. Even if we do still consider the EU cannon Snoke would not be the first to declare himself a Sith Lord with no formal Sith training.

One thing to also take note is that the title Sith Darth is never used in Episode VII. Not for Snoke or for Kylo Ren. This (even though the EU is no longer cannon) leads me to believe this is an entirely new Sith order that isn't bound by the old ones restraints.
EU may no longer be canon, but Darth Bane is still canon to some extent, albeit only in that his ghost appears in an episode of The Clone Wars (the new, canon one).
 

Null Hypothesis

Well-Known Member
Donor III
EU may no longer be canon, but Darth Bane is still canon to some extent, albeit only in that his ghost appears in an episode of The Clone Wars (the new, canon one).
I never got past the first season for the animated one. I heard it was good though. I'll have to find out to what extent Bane is used.
The old republic era in general is still canon.
Disney made it very clear that if it wasn't in a movie or a cartoon it wasn't cannon. Videogames, comics, novels, deleted scenes are now just legends.

It's a shame though since the Old Republic time period has n bearing on the movies Disney is doing, and it is one of my favorite parts of the Star Wars universe.

That doesn't mean Disney couldn't use one of their spin off movies to make one about the Old Republic era and make it cannon again.
 
Last edited:

W1LG3RtheCyan

Well-Known Member
Member
Disney made it very clear that if it wasn't in a movie or a cartoon it wasn't cannon. Videogames, comics, novels, deleted scenes are now just legends.
Most videogames. The Kotor series is still canon, last I heard.

Evidence:
Kylo ren's lightsaber is confirmed to use parts from Revan's in it's construction, including the crystal.
 

Requiem

Well-Known Member
Member
Yeeeaaahhhh... You're gonna need to give us a source on that shit because if Revan's lightsaber was used in any way to make Kylo's Saber, I would have heard about it by now. Not only that, but there's literally no reason to make that part of the new trilogy. Even using part of a lightsaber from the old Republic Era, Revan's or someone else's, is a huge fucking deal for the canon nature of the EU, of which KOTOR is a part of. That's big because it calls into question Disney's blanket removal of the EU. That's not a shitstorm Disney wants to start up.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom