I think you're spot on for the first half of the debate (Trumped up Trickle down lmao), Trump was really strong on Trade (Rather, he sounded good on trade) And Hillary didn't have many good come backs for it, turned into a lot of what you described.I personally am not a fan of either but Trump really disappointed me in the debates, he was billed as this great counter puncher and that Hillary would have to be careful if she went after him, but really it was just a lot of flailing from both sides.
Name one thing wrong with saying that. Try not to use the words racist or sexist this time. Remember, we're talking about a man that callously elbowed a woman in the boob in one of the most violent political acts Canada has ever known....for the record, you're talking to somebody who's just openly declared:
It's another wild claim that you can't substantiate in any way that makes any actual sense. Unless you're a racist, sexist simplet- ah, fuck. There I go again.Name one thing wrong with saying that. Try not to use the words racist or sexist this time.
Can you pick a minister out of his cabinet that doesn't deserve to be there?Trudeau seems well meaning and passionate, but he also says stupid shit. Like focusing on his cabinet having genital parity as though it is something that matters. I'm also pretty sure he wants more Canadian involvement in the UN. One is just stupid pandering, the other I'm just not a fan of.
The UN has to be de-shitted somehow, and that's only possible if countries continue to be involved in it and work earnestly in the hopes of achieving noble goals. While it could certainly be more effective, I believe that it's the best option we have for securing global peace, cooperation, and goodwill in the future.[Trudeau] wants more Canadian involvement in the UN, [which] I'm just not a fan of.
That's a ludicrous expectation, and in any case it should be that Trudeau can justify his cabinet picks (ideally with "they're each the best option I've got for their respective positions"). He shouldn't get a free pass on his picks, because it's not like any other politician would (or should).Can you pick a minister out of his cabinet that doesn't deserve to be there?
If Canada can make the UN more genuinely effective at making all nations not want to fight I'm all for it. I'm not convinced it could be fixed with all of the might of the United States and our influence, so Canada having an agreed impact would be eye-opening. I'd genuinely like to be wrong about the UN being in a state of irreparable corruption and useless bureaucracy.The UN has to be de-shitted somehow, and that's only possible if countries continue to be involved in it and work earnestly in the hopes of achieving noble goals. While it could certainly be more effective, I believe that it's the best option we have for securing global peace, cooperation, and goodwill in the future.
1. There ain't nothing wrong with the occasional wild and unsubstantiated claim.It's another wild claim that you can't substantiate in any way that makes any actual sense. Unless you're a racist, sexist simplet- ah, fuck. There I go again.
(#Trump2016.)1. There ain't nothing wrong with the occasional wild and unsubstantiated claim.
...like what?2. That doesn't explain why you compared it to a perfectly reasonable and easily substantiated claim.