Ah, I think we've both been kinda punks. Sorry for my part in it, but I think we should both acknowledge our bad plays here.
I could have been more clear, but I don't believe I asked you to run a bastard game. The sequence of events was intended to be:
1) I claim OP says doc can't self-protect
2) A player checks the unedited, short and precise OP which clearly does not say that and calls me out for lying (which happened in less than 10 minutes)
3) I go "oh fuck, I was thinking of info from my role PM, yeah I'm the doctor".
You've already established that you don't care if I lie about information in my role PM, so we'd be solid.
Instead, while I was typing up step #3 (within 6 minutes of FD posting) you posted the clarification yourself, including information which was previously not mentioned in the OP (ruining my strat) and insulted me via PM while accusing me of having shitty rule-breaking intentions.
On top of a dead dog at home, that "how could they think you're dumber than you already are" comment cut pretty deep. So I got in a rotten mood and then bitched about it in-game (not a good move). And while that does open the door for you to post the PM log, I think it's silly to equate that to me sharing a non-conflict mafia PM train from a separate game 2.5 years ago, in which you were not a specific target.
I'm not asking for a hug and apology, I just want to know if you have the capacity to admit this conflict wasn't the stupid picture you drew. I realize I look like an emotional ass in the thread here, but christ man. Do you have any sense of ownership or regret in a conflict you've intentionally fueled?